By Christine Massey, M.Sc., exclusively for People For Justice Canada

Canadian public health officials have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification performed anywhere, ever

by HESH GOLDSTEIN, MS NUTRI

In the continuing saga of Dr.Richard Day’s 1969 explicit depiction of how the world’s population would be controlled and reduced, bear in mind that these are not the ramblings of a singular lunatic but the conspiracy imposed upon us by the rich and famous in an effort to have more of the Earth’s resources at their disposal.
As you read this and much more to follow, see how much as already been implemented.

Introduction – The Ultimate Conspiracy

About a year ago or so I wrote and article about the New World’s Order implementation and furtherance of the eugenics plan. This plan was let out of the closet, so to speak, by Dr. Richard Day who was a Professor of Pediatrics at Mount Sinai Medical School in New York. He also served as Medical Director of Planned Parenthood Federation of America and was a profound atheist and an insider of the New World Order.

Dr. Day gave a lecture to the Pittsburgh Pediatric Society in 1969 where he let the hushed cat out of the bag. His lecture was taped and those tapes were finally transcribed.

Basically, the agenda is to corrupt morality, encourage unrestricted sense gratification, and eliminate or ridicule religiosity, spirituality, common sense, and the concept of right or wrong.

As I have a copy of those tape transcriptions I will endeavor to share them with you so you can see the realities that have come and will continue to come our way. It will be up to each and every one of us to pick a side. There is no middle road. How we conduct ourselves and what we impart to our children and loved ones will determine our integrity one way or another.

So, in this article, I will simply list the agendas to be followed in forthcoming articles with more elaboration.

Suffice it to say that the powers to be want our world to go to hell in a hand basket so they can dictate activity, consciousness, and work toward ultimate control over each and every one of us.

The introduction to Dr. Day’s lecture began with:

“Is there a power, a force or a group of men organizing and redirecting change?
Everything is in place and nobody can stop us now. People will have to get use to change”.

The real and stated goals are as follows:

• Population control
• Permission to have babies
• Redirecting the purpose of sex – sex without reproduction and reproduction without sex
• Contraception universally available to all
• Sex education as a tool of world government
• Tax funded abortion as population control
• Encouraging homosexuality as a means of population control
• Families to diminish in importance
• Euthanasia and the “demise pill”
• Limiting access to affordable medical care makes eliminating the elderly easier
• Planning the control over medicine
• Elimination of private doctors
• New difficult to diagnose and untreatable diseases
• Suppressing cancer cures as a means of population control
• Inducing heart attacks as a form of assassination
• Education as a tool for accelerating the onset of puberty and evolution
• Blending all religions. The old religions will have to go
• Changing the Bible through revisions of key words
• The churches will help us
• Restructuring education as a tool of indoctrination
• More time in schools, but not learning anything
• Controlling who has access to information
• Schools as the hub of the community
• Some books would just disappear from the libraries
• Changing laws
• Encouraging drug abuse to create a jungle atmosphere
• Promoting alcohol abuse
• Restrictions on travel
• The need for more jails and using hospitals as jails
• No more security
• Crime used to manage society
• Curtailment of American industrial pre-eminence
• Shifting populations and economies – tearing social roots
• Sports as a tool of social change
• Sex and violence inculcated through entertainment
• Travel restrictions and implanted I.D.s
• Food control (my comment – “hello Monsanto!)
• Weather control (my comment – the Haarp project and hurricane Sandy)
• Know how people respond and make them do what you want
• Falsified scientific research
• Terrorism
• Financial control
• Surveillance, implants, and televisions that watch you
• Home ownership a thing of the past
• The arrival of the totalitarian global system

I’m sure by now you are aware of how much of this has already been implemented. Below, each of the above topics is explained as to how Dr. Douglas presented them. We obviously have more to fight against than the non-labeling of GMO foods.

Read the entire post >>

PS When People Wake up…

When the Lie is too big and too obvious, you need over 21,000 National Guard troops to provide security against inauguration threats in Washington…

Around 21,000 National Guard members were deployed in the nation’s capital to help secure the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden, roughly four times the number of American troops currently deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq combined.

 Media was invited to prepare “evidence” for the “Insurrection”

THE PRESIDENT AND THE PRESS: ADDRESS BEFORE THE AMERICAN NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION, APRIL 27, 1961

The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

[…]

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

[…]

I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or any new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.

[…]

It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation–an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people–to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well–the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers–I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: “An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it.” We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed–and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment– the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- – not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply “give the public what it wants”–but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news – for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security – and we intend to do it.

It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world’s efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.

And so it is to the printing press–to the recorder of man’s deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news–that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.

PS We are not Cattle

https://fb.watch/3aYDVWUICd/

PS OPERATION DARK WINTER

On October 22, presidential candidate Joe Biden mentioned the term “dark winter” during his debate with President Donald Trump. According to some news outlet, Biden on this statement meant to say “extreme coronavirus deaths”. Biden stated in this televised presidential debate:

“220,000 Americans dead. If you hear nothing else I say tonight, hear this. Anyone who’s responsible for that many deaths should not remain as president of the United States of America.”

“We’re about to go into a dark winter and he has no plan”, Joe Biden Added.

But since when did this term came out and what is it really all about? Here’s the story: on June 22–23 in 2001, the Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies, in collaboration with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Analytic Services Institute for Homeland Security, and the Oklahoma National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism, held a senior-level exercise entitled “Dark Winter”. Much like the Event 201 of October 2019, this is a simulation of a covert smallpox attack on the United States. It was constructed “to examine the challenges that senior-level policy makers would face if confronted with a bioterrorist attack that initiated outbreaks of highly contagious disease”.

The designers, authors, and controllers of this program, namely Tara O’Toole and Thomas Inglesby of the Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies and Randy Larsen and Mark DeMier of ANSER, claimed this exercise was “intended to increase awareness of the scope and character of the threat posed by biological weapons among senior national security experts and to bring about actions that would improve prevention and response strategies”.

What’s more interesting to this is that this simulation happened “3 months before 9/11 and 4 months before the Anthrax attacks”. According to an article by globalresearch.ca:

“The scenario of this bio-terrorism drill was designed to simulate a smallpox attack in three states. Numerous congressmen, former CIA director James Woolsey, New York Times reporter Judith Miller (who pushed the Iraq WMD myth, as well as the false link between Iraq and the Anthrax attacks), and anti-terror official Jerome Hauer all participated in the exercise. As a part of this war game, scripted TV news clips were made to help make this drill as realistic as possible. At the end of one of these clips, the reporter says: Iraq might have provided the technology behind the attacks to terrorist groups based in Afghanistan.”

Globalresearch.ca also added that some of the main reasons for this were to help justify the “war on terror” by deliberately demonizing Iraq by linking them to 9/11 twin tower attack in New York City. However, in reality, this claim “has since been debunked by the 9/11 Commission, top government officials, and even – long after they alleged such a link – Bush and Cheney themselves”. To provide more understanding on this very significant topic, globalresearch.ca also wrote:

“The FBI was actually told to blame Anthrax scare on Al Qaeda by White House officials. High-level government insiders pointed towards Iraq as the source of the anthrax, even though there was absolutely no reason to think that the anthrax had come from Iraq.

Dark Winter participants Judith Miller – the New York Times reporter who had long hyped bioterror threats through books and articles – and CIA head Woolsey were two of the loudest voices blaming the Anthrax attacks on Iraq.”

Indeed, according to Gary D. Barnett regarding this massive psychological operation:

“The only real defense that is valid during this exercise in mass tyranny is total refusal to comply with any and all government mandates. We are in the midst of the largest psychological operation (PSYOP) in the history of mankind.

The newest term being targeted toward the masses is the coming of the “Dark Winter,” which is nothing more than propaganda based lies meant to prepare the sheep for a planned continuation and escalation of this fake pandemic in order to bring about world domination.”

References:

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/joe-biden-warns-of-dark-winter-of-covid-in-final-us-presidential-debate-2314690

The Pentagon’s “Operation Dark Winter”: June 2001 Bioterror Exercise Foreshadowed 9/11 and Anthrax Attacks

Coincidence … Or Something More?

On June 22-23, 2001 – some 3 months before 9/11, and 4 months before the Anthrax attacks – the U.S. military held a senior-level war game at Andrews Air Force Base called Dark Winter.

The scenario of this bio-terrorism drill was designed to simulate a smallpox attack in three states. Numerous congressmen, former CIA director James Woolsey, New York Times reporter Judith Miller (who pushed the Iraq WMD myth, as well as the false link between Iraq and the Anthrax attacks), and anti-terror official Jerome Hauer all participated in the exercise.

As a part of this war game, scripted TV news clips were made to help make this drill as realistic as possible.

At the end of one of these clips, the reporter says:

Iraq might have provided the technology behind the attacks to terrorist groups based in Afghanistan.

Why is this interesting?

Because U.S. officials intentionally linked Iraq to Al Qaeda and 9/11 to justify the Iraq war, even though they knew there was no such connection. (The claim that Iraq is linked to 9/11 has since been debunked by the 9/11 Commission, top government officials, and even – long after they alleged such a link – Bush and Cheney themselves.)

Indeed, Dark Winter participant Woolsey – the former CIA director – swore in court testimony that Saddam Hussein was connected to 9/11.

Similarly, the government tried to falsely blame the anthrax attacks on Iraq as a justification for war:

When Congress was originally asked to pass the Patriot Act in late 2001, the anthrax attacks which occurred only weeks earlier were falsely blamed on spooky Arabs as a way to scare Congress members into approving the bill. Specifically:

• The FBI was actually told to blame Anthrax scare on Al Qaeda by White House officials

• High-level government insiders pointed towards Iraq as the source of the anthrax, even though there was absolutely no reason to think that the anthrax had come from Iraq

And see this.

Dark Winter participants Judith Miller – the New York Times reporter who had long hyped bioterror threats through books and articles – and CIA head Woolsey were two of the loudest voices blaming the Anthrax attacks on Iraq.

Woolsey was an outspoken proponent of war against Iraq even before 9/11.

Moreover, the parallels between the Dark Winter exercise and the Anthrax attacks are numerous.  For example, in the Dark Winter exercise:

• Anonymous letters are sent to the media

• Anonymous letters threatened anthrax attacks on the United States

• Iraq and Bin Laden are top suspects

Remember, neoconservatives planned regime change in Iraq 20 years ago (and the U.S. had already carried out regime change in Iraq in the early 1960s).

It has been extensively documented that the White House decided to invade Iraq before 9/11:

• Former CIA director George Tenet said that the White House wanted to invade Iraq long before 9/11, and inserted “crap” in its justifications for invading Iraq. Former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill – who sat on the National Security Council – also says that Bush planned the Iraq war before 9/11. Top British officials say that the U.S. discussed Iraq regime change even before Bush took office. And in 2000, Cheney said a Bush administration might “have to take military action to forcibly remove Saddam from power.” And see this.

• Cheney made Iraqi’s oil fields a national security priority before 9/11. And the Sunday Herald reported: “Five months before September 11, the US advocated using force against Iraq … to secure control of its oil.” (remember that Alan Greenspan, John McCain, George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, a high-level National Security Council officer and others all say that the Iraq war was really about oil.)

Read the Entire Article with important video clips >>

PS QAnon

https://fb.watch/3U-XKjN3N9/