Physics during the age of megaliths

March 2, 2011

Post image for Physics during the age of megaliths

Physics of Megaliths

Over more than twenty years, I have realized hundreds of experiments, which were mostly motivated by trying to uncover the reasons and causes of not always convincingly explained working activities of ancient civilizations. In these experiments, I came to the conclusion that many activities of ancient prehistoric cultures were clearly motivated by the desire to exploit knowledge about the attributes of static electricity. Even in academic publications, I found no information on the range of the found properties of static electricity. It cannot be therefore excluded that they have never been published. For this reason, I admit it might be an entirely new knowledge.

 

Stonehenge in April of 2009. Author: Mactographer. Source: Wikipedia

Four probably yet unpublished properties of static electricity showed on the theme of implementation of many megalithic and religious structures. Many often seemingly useless construction activities of our ancestors could not be convincingly and logically explained without the connection with these new findings of the properties of static electricity. Historians and archaeologists have often helped themselves out by saying that the motivation for constructing many buildings in our history was based solely on a “ritual” or “calendar reason”. All researchers and scientists who “dared” linking knowledge of ancient cultures with modern knowledge of the physical energies were often ridiculed by generally accepted capacities and rendered as being textbook ignorants. The four properties of static electricity introduced are however far from a total explanation of all yet difficult to explain mysteries of our history. In some cases, the new knowledge about the properties of matter in connection with a charge of static electricity provides only partial explanation to the historical mysteries, which suggests that there can be many more unidentified properties of static electricity.

There is no doubt that there is an incorrect interpretation of certain parts of history in connection with the explanation of the motives for constructing many complex, but even the simplest of old buildings. It is therefore necessary to examine the question of logical reasons for building the constructions in context with new physical knowledge, which demonstrates that “knowledge” of ancient and extinct cultures surpassed the knowledge of modern history. The “ritual dogmas” will need to be replaced by new energy knowledge. This will create a real picture of the evolution of world cultures as well as a “springboard” for further research in some historical periods.

The original description was: Remains of megalithic tomb, Mane Braz, Brittany
Taken September 2002 by William M. Connolley.Source: wikipedia:en.

However, there are the already mentioned “scientific” obstacles that discourage many that are interested in modern research. These obstacles that psychologically bind the thinking of many researchers that are eager for truth are the skeptics. The skeptics, in an effort to stand out, which they cannot achieve in a different field of science, serve as scientific inquisitors. Being a skeptic is very easy as skeptics always respond to new ideas by saying “Everything that cannot be put in context with known facts cannot be assessed.” They refuse to respect the fact that all new findings were found behind the edge of known facts in most cases.

I was saddened, for example, when the skeptics in the Czech Republic attached an ‘erratic boulder’ to Erich von Daniken. Even if Daniken did not bring any revolutionary ideas in his work, he would have done more for the promotion of history than all the Czech inquisitional skeptics combined. Daniken inspired hundreds of thousands of researchers around the world by his extensive work – thousands of them chose their field of work due to his exploratory study. And last but not least, after centuries of neglect many historical monuments that were described by Daniken are now cracking under the pressure of curious tourists. Daniken fully described the megalithic culture in his writings.

Literary works by Erich Daniken are well above the writings of other authors, who constantly repeat pieces of information that have already been published many times. I have studied all the writings of Erich Daniken and I can say that I gained more knowledge about the megaliths from his literature than I would have received by personal visits to the places described. There are more such cases, which I will not address here. I regard the ‘erratic boulder’ given to Erich Daniken as the worst injustice.

Skeptics could not have objected to the way Mr. Daniken describes the megalithic culture, but they likely just disagreed with his opinion that it could not have been created by a ‘textbook type’ civilization and that ancient cultures received the information from some advanced cultures from outer space. And here is the discord, skeptics recognize the current interpretation of history, Mr. Daniken, as well as many logically thinking people, does not. It does not matter where the ancient cultures received the information. The fact is that they must have obtained it somewhere. The view of Mr. Daniken that ancient cultures may have obtained the information from space cannot be assessed in any other way then as a creative idea. Any doubts about the astronauts from other planets can encourage others to think about other explanations. The essence of the literary work of Mr. Daniken is not just getting the source of information, but it is the whole megalithic culture. Reacting to the opinion of Mr. Daniken by granting him an ‘erratic boulder’ seems amateur and inappropriate. People expect from scientists that they will scientifically and properly reason their decision.

If skeptics think that people used to build thousands of megaliths all over the world for ritual and calendar purposes (as is currently mentioned in history) they only compromise themselves in the same way as archaeologists do. Unless it is explained what tools were used to machine the hardest diorite rock, unless it is experimentally demonstrated that it is possible to transport a block of rock weighing one thousand tons to a distance of two kilometers solely by the use of pulling and ropes, unless it is explained how people communicated with each other when they built the same types of megalithic structures around the world the account of Mr. Daniken cannot be clearly and categorically questioned. In this case, the purposely formulated assumption proposed by the skeptics by granting Erich von Daniken an ‘erratic boulder’ stated exactly the opposite. They reached a phase where public begun to question statements given by the skeptics.

Attributes of  Static Electricity

The new knowledge about static electricity resulting from the research of megaliths seems like a great hint not only for the research of ancient cultures but also for several other fields. In addition, we can expect further findings of the unknown properties of static electricity.

I remind the importance of the four attributes of static electricity, which I describe in dozens of articles at http://www.miroslavprovod.com.
1 – Each material has a charge with three energy components (aura, zones, and interzones).
2 – When auras of two or more charges come into contact they merge into one common charge with common energy components.
3 – By merging charges into a joint charge, there is a gradual equalizing of their energetic potentials.
4 – During the equalizing of energetic potentials there is also a transfer of chemical properties.

© 2010  Miroslav Provod
All rights reserved. Presented with permission.
Official Website: www.miroslavprovod.com

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

Gary Schoenung July 12, 2012 at 2:16 pm

I’ve posted a small part of 3 hours and 22 minutes of video that I’ve put together that will give you some new insight into Stonehenge and Easter Island.

Here is the link http://vimeo.com/45529817

Reply

Manuel Vega April 28, 2011 at 4:06 pm

If we give the boat and the wheel to the Megalith Builders, many of the ancient monuments could be explained, which could reveal them as the true creators of civilization (onemysteryless.wordpress.com)

Reply

Manuel Vega April 1, 2011 at 10:57 pm

The view that scholars let us have is based on simplifications of the kind: “megalith builders could not travel long distances, or they did not know to use animal traction or the wheel.” But if we let our ancestors to sail the oceans, move the stones with wheels and animals, and to have a more dignified lifestyle, we could solve many of their mysteries without having to resort to ufos. The megalithic sites were indeed deeply related to the sky, but not so much because of the ufos, but because their builders developed along the millennia a cosmic religion based on the cycles of the stars and luminaries that regulated their political and social activities.

Reply

Jesus The Liberal March 10, 2011 at 3:10 pm

Daniken and his wacky aliens…lifting stones. Wow. Those wacky aliens sure “helped” mankind. Why arent they helping now? Why didnt they help any other civilization in need? The Dark Ages needed help…the black death? World wars? The new age mythology. The best these aliens come up with these days are crop circles,”Alien Graffiti”… Kilroy was here…pretty impressive stuff there. Wow. “Oh Great and Wise Pumpkin…teach us again how to create Megaliths.” Atlantis didnt sink…it floated away!!!! Daniken answers nothing. Everything he cant answer has to be “alien intervention”. Too lazy to find any other answer…or look for one. The Guru of Ignorance.

Reply

Ron O. Cook March 3, 2011 at 5:03 am

Mr. Miroslav Provod, I am very impressed with your way of thinking and I believe you are on to a KEY to our existence. Please give us more. I have read your website, and am evaluating all your material. If I were not so old, I would do a deeper study but time is of the essence.

Cheers,
Ron O. Cook

Reply

Ab Asaff March 2, 2011 at 12:51 pm

I agree completely with Miroslav’s article. While I do not totally agree with Danikan’s aliens enlightened ancient cultures theory, though aliens may have been a part of that equation, I don’t believe they were the equation. None the less, Daniken is a great thinker and certainly motivated many people over the years, who were skeptical of the eroneous explanations acedemic historians, etc., were postulating on the ancient cultures, to seek out truth.The ancients were capable of mega-building via knowldge of physicics through a spiritual science that is lost to us. I believe they very well knew how to detect and use static energy and as well sound energy that allowed them to manipulate gravity rendering large tonage of stone to be near weightless. All their sacred structures were acoustically built on Earth’s energy lines and astronomically aligned. The ancients possesed the ability to unite earth energy with celestial or star energy if you will. This allowed them to raise their physcial vibrations to produce a shamanic out of body experience, uniting them with the universe. That experience helped them achieve status of earthly gods and or godeses as they became full of esoteric, devine spiritual understanding. What was science to them, ignorant modern humans would think to be majic.

Reply

Leave a Comment


Previous post:

Next post: