*by A. Sokolowski*

Geometry (Ancient Greek: geo- “**earth**“, -metron “**measurement**“) was originally dealing with **measuring of the earth.** Today, geometry has wider meaning: it is a branch of mathematics concerned with questions of **shape, size, relative position of figures, and the properties of space.** Geometry arose independently in a number of early cultures as a body of practical knowledge concerning lengths, areas, and volumes, with elements of a formal mathematical science.

# Measuring circumference of the Earth

Here is simple method of **establishing circumference (and diameter) of the earth** that (most likely) was **used by the ancient astronomers.**

This method is based on **understanding that Earth**, just like the Sun and the Moon, is also **round** and that stars are very far from our planet (except for the Sun) and they appear to rotate around certain point above the northern horizon (the North Celestial Pole).

*Long exposure photography shows apparent movement of stars around the north celestial pole*

The measuring process should be done in areas with good visibility of the sky, e.g **desert landscape.**

**On the same night, 2 astronomers at two different locations (A and B) separated by known distance** (*it is easy to measure ground distance between points located hundreds km away from each other)*, would **measure the angle above the horizon** (with help of the astrolabe with vertical line given by a plumb-bob) of a certain **star** at its **highest position on the night sky (therefore at the same time.)**

**A star close to the celestial North Pole** (indicating the center of Earth’s rotation axis) would be a good choice for such purpose. **In modern days Polaris would be the best choice, however **thousands of years ago, due to precession (wobble of the earth axis of rotation), **Polaris was not near the North celestial pole** (see the image below).

*Although Polaris, the north star, sits within half a degree of the north celestial pole, this was not always so. Earth’s rotational axis undergoes a slow, 26,000-year wobble, known as precession, around the perpendicular to its orbit around the Sun, as a result of which the position of the sky’s rotational pole, around which all the stars seem to go, constantly changes. Around the time of the Greek poet Homer, Kochab was the north pole star. Among the best ever, however, was Thuban, which was almost exactly at the pole in 2700 BC. It remained better than Kochab up to around 1900 BC, and was therefore the pole star during the time of the ancient Egyptians. Other bright stars, including Alderamin, have served as pole star, and will again in the remote future. The star currently closest to the south celestial pole is Sigma Octantis, which is barely visible to the naked eye and lies 1º 3′ from the pole (though it was as close as 45′ just a century ago). [ Credit: The Encyclopedia of Science ]*

Careful observation of the night sky would allow to select a bright star (s) most suitable for **comparison of altitude of the same star at different location. **

For example, 2,600 BC (see image above) near Giza, when Mizar and Kochab (rotating each night around the North celestial pole) would align with vertical line (marked by a plumb-line), Mizar (with easy to measure altitude) would be** perfect star for comparison of its altitude at different locations (A and B) – at the same time).**

Because the stars are too far from the earth for any parallax effect (a displacement or difference in the apparent position of an object viewed along two different lines of sight), the only reason for the change in the measured angle of the northern star is the **curvature of the earth.**

(Measured Distance AB)/Circumference of the Earth = ( Angle A – Angle B)/360 |

From this equation: **Circumference of the Earth = AB * 360/(Angle A-Angle B)**

*Apparent mean angular diameter of the Moon and the Sun is almost the same: ***0.5 degree (about 30 arcmin). **

Our astronomer/priest should have no problem observing/measuring position of the northern star with **accuracy of 1/4 degree or better.**

Using simple angle measuring instrument (* astrolabe*) calibrated in degrees, he could obtain fairly accurate results (perhaps 0.25 degree accuracy or better).

**FOR EXAMPLE:** If one of our astronomers were doing this measurement from location (A) near Giza ( 30^{0} N ), Mizar would appear about** 41 deg** above the local horizon. If the second astronomer were located 120 nautical miles* south from A (* measured in ancient units of length, of course), he would observe that the altitude of the same star is **39 degrees** (**2 degrees lower than altitude measured at the location**** A).**

These **2 simple measurements** would allow ancient astronomers **calculation of the circumference of the Earth** with fairly high accuracy:

**(360/2)*120 nautical miles = 21,600 nautical miles**,

whence the diameter of the earth can be estimated as:

**21,600 nautical miles/( 22/7) **(ancient Egyptian estimation of the Pi) **=
= 6,873 nautical miles = 12,728 km**

*Note: Modern and accurate data:*

Earth’s **Circumference Between the North and South Poles:**

21,602.6 nautical miles = 24,859.82 miles (40,008 km)

*Earth’s Diameter at the Equator: *

*6,887.7 nautical miles = 7,926.28 miles (12,756.1 km)*

*Copyright 2013 A. Sokolowski
Presented with permission
Any duplication requires proper copyright information
and link to the original article.*

## Modern Units of measuring Length

Modern **units of measure are connected with the SIZE of our planet.**

*Official Circumference of the Earth:
*

**40,075,017 m**(equatorial) and

**40,007,860 m**(meridional)

### Meter

Originally, the **meter was designed to be one ten-millionth (1/10,000,000) of a quadrant, the distance between the Equator and the North Pole.** In other words, meter was defined as **1/10,000,000** of the distance from the Earth’s equator to the North Pole measured on the circumference through Paris.

Using this unit, the circumference of perfectly round Earth should be exactly **40,000, 000 meters (or 40,000 km**).

Today, official value of the Earth’s circumference along the **line of longitude** is **40,007.86 km.**

### Nautical Mile

A **nautical mile** is **based on the circumference of the planet Earth.** If you divide circumference of the Earth into 360 degrees and then divide each degree into 60 minutes you will get **21,600 minutes of arc.**

**1 nautical mile** is defined as **1 minute of arc (of the circumference of Earth).** This unit of measurement is used by all nations for air and sea travel.

Using** 40,007.86 km as the official circumference of our planet** we get value of the nautical mile in kilometers: ** 1.852 km (40,007.86/21,600 )**

Ancient units of measure reveal that** our ancestors were able to measure the size of our planet with very reasonable accuracy…**

### Ancient Units of Length

*In the writings of ***Eratosthenes, he estimated 250,000 stadia for circumference of the earth.**

**Strabo and Pliny indicated ****700 stadia for a degree which gives ****252,000 stadia for the circumference of the Earth.
**

*The*

**stadia was 300 royal cubits**( 157.5 meters or 516.73 feet. )**Pliny’s estimate of earth’s size was very close to the modern official value:**

360 x 700 = 252,000 stadia

252,000 x 300 = 75,600,000 royal cubits = **39,595.349 km** ( using 20.62 ” as value of 1 Royal Egyptian Cubit).

Circumference (2 x Pi x R) of a circle with radius R = 1/12, is equal: (**2xPi)/12 = 0.5236
**

**0.5236 m = 20.614 inch**is close approximation of

**1 Royal Egyptian Cubit**

**Circumference** of any circle has this **number of seconds of arc: **360 x 60 x 60 = **1,296,000**

Radius of such circle would be calculated as **1,296,000 divided by (2xPi)** which is equal to **20.62648** x **10,000** units.

Coincidentally **20.626 inch** is extremely close approximation of 1 **Royal Egyptian Cubit, **unit of length used during construction of the pyramids of Giza.

**Note: **

* 1,296,000 x 100 feet = 129,600,000 feet = 39,502.08 km ( close to 39,595 km, the ancient estimate of Earth’s circumference).*

*For this ancient estimate of the meridional circumference of Earth, its Radius would be 20,626,481 feet [as 129,600,000 ft/(2x pi)] or*

**12,003,771 Royal Egyptian Cubits**or**6,287 km**(official radius of the Earth:**6,367 km**).Another theory: if Earth’s Diameter **D** measured in Sacred Units were given value **24,000,000 units**, its circumference would be equal P*D units.

If such unit was Royal Egyptian Cubit (REC) of **20.62 inch = 0.523748 m** we would get circumference of the Earth equal Pi*D*units [m/REC] = **39,489,669 m** which is very close to the ancient and modern value.

**Of course it is more likely that ancient priests created the Royal Cubit ( REC ) based on their estimate of the circumference of the Earth and division of the Radius into 12,000,000 units.**

Sometime in remote antiquity, somewhere in the Middle East, someone devised a method for dealing with circles:

**He said there are 360 degrees, 21,600 minutes, 1,296,000 seconds in a circle.
**This rule is true regardless of the size of the circle: one inch diameter or a million miles. As such it has no mathematical dimension.

Expressed mathematically, and true for all circles, the Circumference is equal to 2 Pi times the Radius, C = 2 Pi R, or, exchanging symbols, R = C/2 Pi.

If we divide this last number, 1,296,000, by 2 Pi, *6.28318531 . . ., we get a statement about the property of the radius of the circle:
*

**The radius in length is 206,264.806 . . . units.**The number *206,265 is used by astronomers to estimate celestial objects that are at great distances. For example One Parsec is equal to 206,265 AU, where AU is the distance from the sun to the earth.
*

*However, our interest is terrestrial, not celestial. We can take the number of units in the radius of a circle and massage it into a form that is much easier to manipulate. We do this by reducing the size of the number.*

*The number 10,000 would not occur naturally, by itself. It is a number devised by intelligent mind.*

**We can divide this number by 10,000.**

*The fact that 10,000 is so neatly suited to our goal makes it outstanding as an intelligent step in our process.
*

**We get 20.626,480****units.**

*This number is purely intellectual. It has no basis in the literal world. It is defined mathematically.*

*We should remember that this number is defined as a distance along the radius of the circle which constitutes our intellectual framework.*

I shall now show why this is such a startling number.

**20.626+ **is the **length of a Royal Egyptian Cubit in English inches, now accepted in the scholarly world.**

Within our ability to measure, the two numbers are identical, one an intellectual creation from long in the past, the other a measured length.

**— Ernest Moyer**

**Here is unbelievable “coincidence”:**

**Pi = 3.141 592 654 ** (“Pi” approximated to the 9^{th} decimal place).

If we multiply first 10 numbers of the Pi:

3 x 1 x 4 x 1 x 5 x 9 x 2 x 6 x 5 x 4 =** 129,600**

we get the number equal

*1/10 of 360°x60’x60” (number of arcseconds in a circle)*129,600 **x 2** = **25,920** x 10 which is **10x Earth’s precession cycles** ( 10 x period of **precession of the equinoxes**)

**Sun’s circumference** is exactly **109.1** times longer than the earth’s circumference.

This number multiplied by **24** is 26184.4 and divided by **5000** = 0.52368.

**0.52368 meters = 20.617323 inch = 1 Royal Egyptian Cubit**

## PS Ancient Units of Measure

Looking at the chart below we can see why Plato said the numbers 5 and 6 did “honour to the odd and even”.

**Taking the circumference of the world as 360º, each degree comprises 60 “geographic” or “nautical” miles.
We can then choose to divide the geographic mile by 6,000 for geographic feet, or by 5,000 for Egyptian remen.**

But first, we have four different ways to calculate the geographic mile.

We could take the “polar diameter x pi” and divide by 360 x 60.

Or we could take the “equatorial diameter x pi” divided by 360 x 60.

There again we could take a minute of latitude of where we lived and use that as our geographic mile which would vary depending on whether we lived in Greece, Athens or Babylonia, or alternatively, for a more Universal geographic mile we could take the mean figure for a minute of latitude and use that.

In the above chart, the **Greeks** to calculate the **Greek foot **used a **1/6,000th** part of a minute of latitude in Greece.

In **Egypt** on the other hand, they took a **5,000th part of a geographic mile** based on the mean figure for a geographic mile and called this distance **1 x remen**.

From the base of a square of 5,000 remen, they obtained a diagonal which became 5,000 Egyptian Royal Cubits.

This was very useful for land surveying since in order to set out a square of 100 royal cubits, all they had to do was to set out a base line of 200 remen and intersect two arcs of 100 royal cubits on one side of the base line, and intersect 2 arcs of 100 royal cubits on the other side of the base line.

**The Egyptian royal cubit comprised 28 fingers which was 7 palms, whereas 6 palms or 24 fingers made the regular Egyptian cubit and 4 palms or 16 fingers made the Egyptian foot.**

If you set out a square whose sides were 2400 Egyptian royal cubits of 20.625″, and then divided by 2500 you would then have units of Sumerian cubits of 19.8″

100 of these cubits made an “Atlantean” or “Olmec” stade which comprised 150 Sumerian feet, 60 Sumerian yards, or 30 Sumerian double-yards of 100 Sumerian shusi while if you divided it by 96 it became 96 Egyptian royal cubits or dividing by 48 gave Mayan hunabs so 1 x Mayan hunab was 2 x Egyptian royal cubits.

The differences arose depending on your preferred mathematical method, whether you **divided by halves, quarters or eighths or by thirds** …

**while the Babylonians/Sumerians generally preferred 60’s, the Egyptians 10’s and the Mayans 20’s ….**

Source: Website of Jim Allen http://www.atlantisbolivia.org/

Oun Kwon says

Please tell me how to find oneself in terms of longitude – (without map, without knowing the location). The same for latitude is well covered – books and youtube, which has been the concern of sailors. I cannot find any on google search. All they tell how to read maps to find the answer? What do I need? A magnetic compass, a ruler, a protractor – and observe the sun several days to follow its move?

j.a. says

Place is first because when evaluation happens do take in account that ancient knowledge and ability is given to design of sorts on earth as it is stated the ancient knew how to make the stars glow with the energy of monuments this keeps universal principles and order as even shown with structures in other lands this is direct intervention with material substance from a cosmic akashic field imagine the power of movement and measure mixed with the sense of the human form as displayed abundance is to all that is a national system much prefer that way of enginered desighn in concepts starvent as for technology the basis has to be straight from the supreme all else is derived from the one that become the many.

Jason says

Caused the review previous placement titles fussioning time,space,place mystery.

Jason says

register

Jason says

Your symestry attempts have a top and down rating stay tuned once again just from A stranger mystery.

Elijahovah says

It also says that Columbus presumed all of Eurasia (11,250miles) covered 225° longitude with 135° of ocean (6750 miles) from Spain to Asia. And Japan another 3700 miles from China so that the total 15,700 miles is leaving an ocean of only 2300 miles from Africa’s Canary Islands to Japan. Neede we say idiot while American schools of 1965 lied and said Columbus knew the world was round when Catholics said it was flat. When in fact Eurasia (8700 miles) covers 130° including Japan (10,000 miles) 150°.

Elijahovah says

Oldest surviving record of measuring the earth accurately. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eratosthenes

700 egyptian stadia per degree (157.5 meters per stadia) making Earth’s circumference 252,000 egyptian stadia (39,690 km), an error of less than 2%.

Columbus measured the round earth as 18,000 miles instead of 24,000.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chistopher_Colombus

Geographical

Richard says

How you can measure the diameter of the earth [ I believe this should work, if not please let me know]. On the longest day of the year when the sun is at its highest during the day, have a post set at least 10 ft or more perpendicular to the earth (use water at top to level the post, Look at the shadow and determine the angle of the edge of the shadow to the post. Then [360/by angle] X [the distance from your location to the equator] = the circumference of the earth north and south [longitude]. The further away from the equator the more accurate the estimate is and the higher the post or object you use instead of the post. The distance of 67 miles for one degree is needed. I tested this with CAD drawings and it was suprisently accurate, the sun is so far away that it comes in at the same angle as the centre any where so is a costant to thousands of a degree.

Richard Perry says

If I where to measure the earths diameter I would watch the movement of shaddows and see how fast they move over land in a minute and multiply it times 60 x 24 and thats the diameter.

Alex says

Richard, this would not work. Speed of rotation can be established easily as 360deg/(24hx60min/h) = 1/4 deg/min (in 1 minute earth rotates by 0.25 degree). However this does not tell you anything about the size of the radius of the earth. Size of a shadow (of an obelisk) depends only on the height of the obelisk, time of the year, and geographical location…

shahine ali says

Please check my video- “end of the world. a new reality”. If you’re already on youtube, you’ll have to add “-shahine ali” to get it. I have a website, crystalcodex.com where i show our ancestors knew more than we have yet understood( precession, for example). I would really appreciate feedback.

Brenda Brown says

Hi A Sokolowski, I have no doubt that our ancient ancestors knew about geometry, and could easily have measured the earth with it. However, I very much believe that they knew a whole lot more than that. The few but extremely telling building sites of theirs that remain, reveal a science and knowledge way beyond anything we have ever accomplished, or understand right now. And not only are these sites on earth, but in our Solar System, so I think we’re the ones who need to catch up on many aspects of their every-day culture and know-how.

Ron O. Cook says

Would that you lived down the street, Alex. I would have enjoyed our conversations immensely. Build an interior chat facility that only certain members would be able to communicate, not unlike a friendly chess game and perhaps many will come — for a price of course.