10 Insane Ancient Achievements that Science Can’t Explain

10 Insane Ancient Achievements that Science Can’t Explain

Out-of-place artifact (OOPArt) is a term coined by American naturalist and cryptozoologist Ivan T. Sanderson for an object of historical, archaeological, or paleontological interest found in a very unusual or seemingly impossible context that could challenge conventional historical chronology. The term “out-of-place artifact” is rarely used by mainstream historians or scientists. Its use is largely confined to cryptozoologists, proponents of ancient astronaut theories, and paranormal enthusiasts….

In this article we present our selection of Top 10 OOPArts. There are many more (you can find them by exploring our website).

1. Tiwanacu and Puma Punku

Tiwanaku (Spanish: Tiahuanaco and Tiahuanacu) is an important Pre-Columbian archaeological site in western Bolivia, South America. Pumapunku also called “Puma Pumku” or “Puma Puncu”, is part of a large temple complex or monument group that is part of the Tiwanaku.   Tiahuanaco is an example of engineering so monumental that it dwarfs even the work of the Aztecs. Stone blocks on the site weigh many tons. They bear no chisel marks, so the means by which they were shaped remains a mystery. The stone itself came from two different quarries. One supplied sandstone and was situated 10 miles away. It shows signs of having produced blocks weighing up to 400 tons. The other supplied andesite and was located 50 miles away, raising the question of how the enormous blocks were transported in an age before the horse was domesticated in South America. Close examination of the structures shows an unusual technique behind their building. The stone blocks were notched, then fitted together so that they interlocked in three dimensions. The result was buildings strong enough to withstand earthquakes.

Gateway of the Sun, Tiahuanaco, Bolivia

Puma Punku  site has many finely cut stones –  some weighing over 100 tonnes. The processes and technologies involved in the creation of these temples are still not fully understood by modern scholars. Raad More >>

Monolithic stone blocks with precisely cut elements. Puma Punku, Bolivia

Image Source >>

2. Nazca Lines

The high desert of Peru holds one of the most mystifying monuments of the known world—the massive-scale geoglyphs known as the Nazca Lines.  The “lines” are ranging from geometric patterns to “drawings” of different animals and stylized human-like forms.

The ancient lines can only be truly taken in, their forms discerned, from high in the air, leaving generations mystified as to how these precise works could’ve been completed long before the documented invention of human flight. Who built them and what was their purpose? Are the lines signs left by an alien race? Ancient “crop circles”?  Landing strips for alien gods/astronauts?  Relics of a ancient people far more advanced—capable of human flight—then previously imagined? Or perhaps a giant astronomical calendar?  Read More >>

3. Sacsayhuaman

Sacsayhuamán (also known as Sacsahuaman) is a walled complex near the old city of Cusco, at an altitude of 3,701 m. or 12,000 feet. The site is part of the City of Cuzco, which was added to the UNESCO World Heritage List in 1983.

Giant walls of Sacsayhuaman

 They are three parallel walls built in different levels with lime-stones of enormous sizes.  Zigzagging walls are made of boulders used for the first or lower levels are the biggest; there is one that is 8.5 m high (28 ft.) and weights about 140 metric tons. Those boulders classify the walls as being of cyclopean or megalithic architecture.  There are no other walls like these. They are different from Stonehenge, different from the Pyramids of the Egyptians and the Maya, different from any of the other ancient monolithic stone-works.  Scientists are not certain how these huge stones were transported and processed to fit so perfectly that no blade of grass or steel can slide between them. There is no mortar.  The stones often join in complex and irregular surfaces that would appear to be a nightmare for the stonemason.   Read more >>
[subject related:  Evidence of Vitrified Stonework in the Inca Vestiges of Peru ]

4. Stonehenge

Stonehenge is a megalithic monument on the Salisbury Plain in Southern England, composed mainly of thirty upright stones (sarsens, each over ten feet tall and weighing 26 tons), aligned in a circle, with thirty lintels (6 tons each) perched horizontally atop the sarsens in a continuous circle. There is also an inner circle composed of similar stones, also constructed in post-and-lintel fashion.

Stonehenge is angled such that on the equinoxes and the solstices, the sun rising over the horizon appears to be perfectly placed between gaps in the megaliths. This is doubtless not an accident, and probably contributed to the stories of its mysterious origins.

Gerald Hawkins, a Professor of Astronomy, concluded that Stonehenge was a sophisticated astronomical observatory designed to predict eclipses (Stonehenge Decoded). The positioning of the stones provides a wealth of information, as does the choice of the site itself. If you can see the alignment, general relationship, and the use of these stones then you will know the reason for the construction. The author, and other astronomers, discovered the 56-year cycle of eclipses by decoding Stonehenge!  The movement of stones once each year from an initial fixed position allows to predict accurately every important lunar event for hundreds of years. This computer would need resetting about once every 300 years by advancing the stones by one space. Mankind generally used the cycle of the moon as a unit of timekeeping.

Read more:

5. Costa Rica Stone Spheres

One of the strangest mysteries in archaeology was discovered in the Diquis Delta of Costa Rica. Since the 1930s, hundreds of stone balls have been documented, ranging in size from a few centimetres to over two meters in diameter. Some weigh 16 tons. Almost all of them are made of granodiorite, a hard, igneous stone. These objects are monolithic sculptures made by human hands.  Read More >>

Balls in the Courtyard of National Museum, San José, Costa Rica. Photo courtesy of John W. Hoopes. Copyright ©2001 John W. Hoopes. All rights reserved.

6. Trilithon at Baalbeck

The mysterious ruins of Baalbek. One of the great Power Places of the ancient world. For thousands of years its secrets have been shrouded in darkness, or bathed in an artificial light by those who would offer us a simplistic solution to its mysteries.

The Temple of Jupiter is one of the most impressive Temples in Baalbeck. It measures 88×48 meters and stands on a podium 13 meters above the surrounding terrain and 7 meters above the courtyard. It is reached by a monumental stairway. One of the most amazing engineering achievements is the Podium which was built with some of the largest stone blocks ever hewn. On the west side of the podium is the “Trilithon”, a celebrated group of three enormous stones weighing about 800 tons each.

Some archaeologists might well wish that Baalbek had been buried forever. For it is here that we find the largest dressed stone block in the world – the infamous Stone of the South, lying in its quarry just ten minutes walk from the temple acropolis. This huge stone weighs approximately 1,000 tons – almost as heavy as three Boeing 747 aircraft.

The large stone at Baalbek, known as the Stone of the Pregnant Woman. Copyright by Ralph Ellis (source: Wikipedia)

Read More:

7. Great Pyramid of Giza

The Great Pyramid of Giza (also called the Khufu’s Pyramid, Pyramid of Khufu, and Pyramid of Cheops) is the oldest and largest of the three pyramids in the Giza Necropolis bordering what is now Cairo, Egypt, and is the only one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World that survives substantially intact. It is believed the pyramid was built as a tomb for Fourth dynasty Egyptian King Khufu (Cheops in Greek) and constructed over a 20 year period concluding around 2560 BC. The Great Pyramid was the tallest man-made structure in the world for over 3,800 years.

Originally the Great Pyramid was covered by casing stones that formed a smooth outer surface, and what is seen today is the underlying core structure. Some of the casing stones that once covered the structure can still be seen around the base. There have been varying scientific and alternative theories regarding the Great Pyramid’s construction techniques. Most accepted construction theories are based on the idea that it was built by moving huge stones from a quarry and dragging and lifting them into place.

Read More:

8. Shroud of Turin

The Shroud of Turin is reputedly Christ’s burial cloth. It has been a religious relic since the Middle Ages. To believers it was divine proof the Christ was resurrected from the grave, to doubters it was evidence of human gullibility and one of the greatest hoaxes in the history of art. No one has been able to prove that it is the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth, but its haunting image of a man’s wounded body is proof enough for true believers.

The Shroud of Turin, as seen by the naked eye, is a negative image of a man with his hands folded. The linen is 14 feet, 3 inches long and 3 feet, 7 inches wide. The shroud bears the image of a man with wounds similar to those suffered by Jesus.

One theory is simply that the Shroud is a painting . It has been proposed that it was painted using iron oxide in an animal protein binder. The STURP scientists have concluded from their studies that no paints, pigments, dyes or stains have been found to make up the visible image. Could the image have been produced by a burst of radiation (heat or light) acting over short period of time which would have scorched the cloth? Scientists have not been able to duplicate the characteristics of the Shroud using this method just like the painting hypothesis. Also the color and ultraviolet characteristics of the Shroud body image and a scorch are different. The shroud body image does not fluoresce under UV light but scorches like the burns from 1532 do fluoresce under UV light. Thus many scientists rule out the radiation theory.  Read More >>

9. Star Child Skull

In the 1930?s, in a small rural village 100 miles southwest of Chihuahua, Mexico, at the back of a mine tunnel, two mysterious remains were found: a complete human skeleton and a smaller, malformed skeleton. In late February of 1999, Lloyd Pye was first shown the Starchild skull by its owners. Nameless then, it was a highly anomalous skull.

Front view of the Starchild skull (on the left) and the human skull (on the right). Compare striking differences between depth of eye sockets and shape of temporal area just behind outer edges of eyes.

The long-standing Star Being legends of Central and South America provide a plausible mechanism for how a highly abnormal skull (relative to humans) might have been biologically created rather than genetically or congenitally malformed, or physically manipulated by deliberate deformation (binding).
Such immense deformation across the entire occipital (rear) and parietal (upper side) areas of the skull could not result from binding without deformation being visible in the frontal area, which is not evident.
Birth defects across the entire occipital and parietal areas, while not impossible, seem highly unlikely because of the remarkable symmetry exhibited in all areas of the skull, including those effected by the deformations.
The terrain of the bone in the eye sockets contains incredibly subtle indentations and ridges that are perfectly symmetrical in both sockets, which simply have to have been formed by genetic directions rather than by deformations.

Related to this subject is Enormous Cone Head Of Paracas Peru:

Read More:

10. The Antikythera Mechanism

The device, made of bronze and encased in wood, was found by divers off the Mediterranean island Antikythera in 1900.

“This device is just extraordinary, the only thing of its kind,” says Mike Edmunds  (Cardiff University, Wales) one of  the scientists  investigating this amazing artefact. “The design is beautiful. The astronomy is exactly right. The way the mechanics are designed just makes your jaw drop.”

Image Copyright © 2001-2012, Anthony Ayiomamitis

Nothing like this instrument is preserved elsewhere. Nothing comparable to it is known. from any ancient scientific text or literary allusion. On the contrary, from all that we know of science and technology in the Hellenistic Age we should have felt that such a device could not exist. Some historians have suggested that the Greeks were not interested in experiment because of a contempt-perhaps induced by the existence of the institution of slavery-for manual labor. On the other hand it has long been recognized that in abstract mathematics and in mathematical astronomy they were no beginners but rather “fellows of another college” who reached great heights of sophistication. Many of the Greek scientific devices known to us from written descriptions show much mathematical ingenuity, but in all cases the purely mechanical part of the design seems relatively crude. Gearing was clearly known to the Greeks, but it was used only in relatively simple applications. They employed pairs of gears to change angular speed or mechanical ad- vantage, or to apply power through a right angle, as in the water-driven mill.  Read More >>


  1. Pete says

    New discovery was made just recently in ural mountains. Stones that have cut straight edges, Black pyramid that the Russian scientist, archeologists have seen it but it is in such area that they can’t get to, tunnel. Cut rocks that are bigger the Baalbek stone works. Saw it in YouTube a short presentation.

    • amadeus says

      They were no where near that big, aren’t man-made and the expedition has shown no actual evidence of such. The two most “astounding” pictures were actually stones from South america photoshopped into the photos of the explorers.
      It’s bunk!

      • William says

        No, they are much larger and heavier than the stones in Lebanon. The Lebanon stones weigh a maximum of 1300 tons while those in Russia weigh. As much as 4000 tons. The Russian stones are cut and stacked on one another dispelling that they are natural in origin.

    • says

      Science explains every one of these except some of the explanations are wrong or leave out something important. All are fully explained in the forum here.

  2. Brenda Brown says

    Hi Starheater. Just to set the record straight for you, I haven’t been interested enough in this particular ‘mystery’ to read all the material about it, basically because of the reason I gave you. It really doesn’t affect anyone’s salvation whether or not the shroud of Turin is genuinely Christ’s image, as it won’t bring the ‘believer’ salvation by itself. However, from what I’ve read in this article, no, I don’t believe it is Christ’s wrappings. He gave up His Spirit soon after His sufferings, which is why the Roman guard remarked on Him already being dead, and thus rigour would have set in early. Since this person had a ‘relaxed’ pose, I doubt it was Him. Don’t worry StarHeater, I’m not afraid of your ‘bite’. The only reason I won’t oblige someone with a response is if they are arguing just to argue. No point in doing that.

    • Starheater says

      Hello Brenda
      Bite!!!!! Hum… Please explain, I don’t understand. Does your “bite” have any connection with the fact that I have talk about Christian? But you are not Christian, you have told me so lately, I’m lost…
      I know that the Shroud of Turin doesn’t make a “base” on the factor “belief” a Christian, but for some, it have an impact on their faith. On the fact that you have mention: “this person had a ‘relaxed’ pose”, well it could have been so. The Christ new in advance what would be is tribulation, and He has accepted this one. So in my opinion I think that He could have been relax, this naturally is just the other side of the medal.
      So to resume, if I was in a mood to bite you, I will do it gently, and perhaps, very gently. ?

      Bye Brenda

    • Starheater says

      Hello Brenda
      I almost forgot. Lately I didn’t have much time to comment on the entire subject underneath. So take a look on those others subjects, I left some comment that “bite”, lol ?.

      Bye Brenda

  3. DARYL says

    I always find it funny that people look so much at stone structures, crystal skulls and other such technologies from the ancients when all you need to do is look in the mirror. The technology that is in your body and all other life for that matter is on a magnitude so much greater than the technologies that are presented above. But yet here we are. If someone can explain to me the miracle and technology that let that just happen through billions of years worth of accidents and random selection I am all ears. Nuw that is what I call alien technology!

    • osman says

      yes. The unbelievable miracles in just a hair of our body makes us believe that an extraordinary power makes us live, ALLAH

  4. Keith Wright says

    I am surprised that you did not list Rock Gate or Coral Castle in Homestead Florida as one of these sites. Not only did a man with a grade 4 education and weighing 98 pounds, cut, move and set over 110,000 tons of stone by himself, he left it for all to wonder and try to uncover. Science has a way of over thinking things and fails to see the simple details and power of nature. Go see for yourself. The techniques are the same on all these sites, I have visited many of them in search of that illusive technology. Edward Leedskalnin proved us all wrong, that using primitive tools, what seems impossible is possible. That knowledge is not so much forgotten, as much as suppressed. Even he was beaten to a pulp and scared to his death bed to reveal how it was done. Makes one wonder…

    • Robin says

      Coral castle is magnificent. Though I have yet to visit. The fact of something like that built is just mind blowing…. but with much research they are determined that those stone were moved using the earth magnetic field.

      • Starheater says

        Hello Robin

        In reality the magnetic field was not utilize in the transporting of those huge stones, this field was cancel by a opposing frequency, the effect was immediate, stone was now lighter than a feather, so it could be place anywhere with no difficulties.

        Bye Robin

  5. Starheater says

    Hello Everyone

    I would like to point out that Mr. Erik Von Daniken, even if I has a great knowledge, is wrong in is assumption that all the huge and heavy construction was made by Et’s, there is solid proofs that no Et’s were implicated in those construction.
    Some of you might think that the Pyramids of Giza are made by Pleiadians, of the Seven Stars of Pleiades. The fact that one of the channel of the Pyramid of Kheops point at the Pleiades is not a good deduction, because the other channel open the structure, it point out another direction.

    As far I know in that subject, the research that I have made since late 90, I have conclude that the multiple sorts of UFO that we have encounter are from: the Grey’s, and human’s, all the others that I have knew had the tendency of denying the Christ and to advance another kind of religious way of living, others have been “made up” to stop those who have this religious tendency. Peoples that are trap with those kind of special “medium” condemn to waste their time, that’s my opinion regarding this fact.

    Bye Thomas

    • Defiant says

      Yeah…Van D pretty much just makes things up. He’s been re-legitimized by the ludicrous BS on the History Channel….but he’s always been a charlatan.

      • Starheater says

        Hello Defiant

        I don’t know if Von Daniken is a charlatan, but one thing that I am sure off, is that he’s wrong in assuming that we are E.T’s, this possibility is 1/1000, in my way of thinking, it might be lower or greater.
        On thing I cannot explain at this moment, is the fact that we have Chinese type of humans. Some experts evoke that they are part of the Ancient World, I have many doubts, first because of the Bible, second, because of their “legends”. According to their legends, Japanese said to have come from the sky, well for certain population of Africa, white men came from the sky.
        Like the Bible say:

        Ecclesiastes 1:10 Is there anything of which it may be said, “See, this is new”? It has already been in ancient times before us.

        And Von Daniken is part of this scenario who ever he is. His discoveries have go “twice” around the World, but for him, only one conclusion, they came from outer space. I think that this man is a adept of the theory of Darwin, for him the first couple of human were dumb.

        If you have an explanation why Chinese and Japanese are looking so different from us, let me know Defiant.


        • Robin says

          Funny that this topic is here. Back on the 2nd I had posted on a different topic that leads right in with this conversation… and is as follows…..

          The term race was coined long before our ancestors found earth…. one has to be very shallow to truly believe that a mysterious being created 2 sole individuals then later claimed that incest was wrong!!!! If that’s where we started from then we are all aunts/uncles, mother/father-daughter/son, cousins of each and every living “homo-sapien”. Then there are those that believe the evolution theory that we started out as a single cell organism. Well….. no explanation there!!!!! Then the so called “space scientists” lead us to believe that earth is the only planet that can sustain life. HAHAHA…. AGAIN I CALL BS. try this on for thought…….. our ancestors planets either were overpopulation and were forced to find another planet for their dependants to thrive. OR our ancestors that settled earth were prisoners or war and earth was their prison… and the whole race thing is that we were of different planetary origin and through many thousands of years of inter species breeding we all adapted a similar D.N.A. configuration. And the simple fact of us looking different is not only due to the difference in planetary genes but we adapted to the areas of earth we lived in involving the temperatures, direct sunlight, ectera ectera ectera………..

          Just a thought of mine that sounds more logical than the beliefs of the way everyone is taught

          • Starheater says

            Hello Robin
            Well, there is some logic in what you are saying, but there are some points that don’t explain all what there is.
            First, you must admit one thing, life had a beginning, if it’s not on the Earth, and well it is elsewhere, but if its elsewhere, why not here on this Earth. Now, if we are Earthling because we are born on Earth, than how this happen, from a stupid microbe? And who as created this microbe (this is an example), the Law of Hazard? If it were this Law, we wouldn’t be here to talk about it, right?
            So, don’t be shy to say that God as created humans, there is no other “logic” explanation, you see how the Nature is beautiful and done with care and “reason”, and I say reason because we are capable to understand the Nature enough to keep it healthy. (We try!)
            In the Bible it is said that God created Adam and Eve with “dust” or earth, whatever, and if we take the composition of the elements that we are made, it is the same as the Earth. So when I read scientific news about our self, well I cannot think otherwise that claim that we were made by the Almighty God. The idea that we have of God is not what God is, are you with me? Look around you, see the Earth in is magnitude, now let’s see the Universe infinite, with no end in greatness or in smallness, and this exactly like maths, after “one” no end, before one, no end too. So try to portray God in is true Wisdom?
            God is Logic, you are logic, God is Intelligent, and you are too.
            In the Bible, all was done in steps. First, it is normal that male and female that was born from Adam and Eve had to bread themselves, they couldn’t make it other ways, they did that until the population was enough in numbers to be rule by other Law, and this was a must.
            But in the Beginning, peoples were living underground, and they are living here right now at this moment, those peoples are the Greys. Those Greys are not “demons”, demons don’t died, but those Greys dies. In the Bible there are 3 verses that mentions peoples that live underground that Jesus have teach to before He went in the Heaven. And even they don’t look like us, they behave like us, the great majority are good and they love their neighbors, but since we make atomic experience, a great number of them are in danger, getting the picture? So they have tried to wake our sense of Charity, but they were ignored, that’s we there are some operation of sabotages. But this was not enough, they had to contact a great number of individuals so they could have the chance to let know that they are good and they want peace with their neighbors.
            Now, let’s talk about the point that you have mention: Incest
            When men as develop enough on the Earth, certain Laws were imposing, not given to take or not. Those who didn’t want those Laws were made to give strength, health, and Justice to men and mostly to bring order in the rank of certain tribes. I will stop here; I think you have understood enough, right?

            Bye Robin

  6. Rabbitnexus says

    Interesting way to put this. “The term “out-of-place artefact” is rarely used by mainstream historians or scientists. Its use is largely confined to cryptozoologists, proponents of ancient astronaut theories, and paranormal enthusiasts….” since the “Out of place artefacts” do exist, despite being studiously ignored by mainstream archaeologists, then it seems this is an admission that mainstream archaeologists are just hacks, devoid of scientific reasoning and married primarily to their careers…

  7. ThomasT says

    Many of us have ancestry that first came here 22 million years ago, (with beyond lightspeed travel tech). Thus these anomalies can all be explained as due to previous high tech civilizations… not ‘recognised by scientists, nasa, seti and Govts…

    Millions have already opened the Billy Meier site, http://www.theyfly.com and read The Pleiadian Mission by US psychologist Randolph Winters, based on the Meier et contacts. Winters spent 4 months with Meier in Switzerland. Many here have common ancestry with this race, as we are both descended from an ancient race from the Lyra Constelaltion, sun Vega.

    This group of et are now 12,500 years ahead of us in tech, medicine and The Creational Laws. We slipped back! They live 500 light years distant in the Taurus Constellation, sun Taygeta, on 4 inhabited planets, in a slightly different ‘time’. They take 7 hours to get here in their own ships, but have a new ship on loan from friends in the Dal parallel Universe that gets here in a millionth of a second. The Dals also gave them the tech for their ‘big spacer’, that is 10 miles in diameter with a crew of 144K and fully self contained,

    If you believe that 4M years ago your ancestors were chimps, when humankind in this Dern Universe has a history of nearly 100 billion years, in this Great Time, a Great Time being 311.04 trillion years, and that we are ‘alone’, and that these listed anomalies are unidentified/unknown.. that is your problem.

    • Starheater says

      Hello Thomas

      I don’t want to disappoint you but Billy Meier is a LIAR, I have saw a film that have taken him 2 days, or if you prefer in 2 shot. In the first shot you could see the UFO waving like it seem to be affected by a smooth wind, (there was no wind at all) the sequence was shot to show us how the UFO could appear and disappear, on the second shot, a smooth wind was blowing, and a branch of a three that was clause to the camera that didn’t move on the first shot, it move on the second shot.
      So this has proven to me that the disappearance follow after a few second by the reappearance of the UFO was a “made off”, a hoax if you will..


      • Rabbitnexus says

        You’re actually a complete idiot, sorry to inform you. What sort of childish silliness are you engaging in to assume the moving UFO was moving as a result of “wind”? What a baboon!

        • Starheater says

          Hello Rabbitnexus

          Calm down, there is no need to write down such foolish words. If you can evaluate scientist, well this mean that you have science in your mind, without this requirement you would not be able to analyse this situation, right?
          Now, if you can explain to me how a UFO work and how it fly, then I will assume my being, I’m an idiot.
          But if you are not capable, and this is what I think, well, I will let you think wisely.

          Those “flying engine” that we call UFO have a name, this name is: “Dynaspheric Engine”, and if you know that, and that would surprise me!!! You would know at the same time that those engine wouldn’t have move a centimetre even if it were a “hurricane”, So, would you want me to nicely explain how it work, I am accustomed to those kind of reactions, they only happen because peoples don’t know how those engine work.
          So I am no offense in any way Rabbitnexus.


    • says

      The ancient accomplishments listed, absolutely pale in comparison to many other ancient technological advancements that surpass our own today by many orders of magnitude…..See for yourselves…



      Good Journies

      • Brenda Brown says

        Hi Paul Tarsus. Yes, I know what you mean. Thanks for those links, I found it to be very interesting stuff. I am well aware that we are in the count down, and while ‘they’ can hide some of these things for awhile, it won’t be long before God is going to unveil the truth for all to see, hear, and feel.. Of course what God can do will always outshine anything man can conceive of – no doubt there. Enjoyed it because I’m ready.

    • Rabbitnexus says

      Anyone who believes as you say, is also really not advanced significantly from those chimps they believe were their ancestors.

      • Brenda Brown says

        I’m not sure who you were referring to, but as far as I’m concerned, no chimps were anyone’s ancestors except the more recent chimps.

  8. Brenda Brown says

    I think trying to write an article on 10 of these ancient mysteries is quite a huge undertaking. Each one of them would easily have made an article by themselves. I thoroughly enjoyed the reference about the Key to Stonehenge however, because it wasn’t afraid to stand back and start believing these people knew ‘tons’ more than they’ve been given credit for.

    One thing that never ceases to amaze me as well, is that no matter how much we are always supposed to ‘ooooo’ and ‘aaahhhh’ over how fantastic the ‘mystery’ connected to these places is, and the means it took to build them, we’re expected to swallow the most ridiculous ‘answers’ that science provides us concerning them. I don’t care how many people you bring together to drag these stones into place, show me the ropes that would have withstood that kind of pulling and dragging; the ramps it would take to get them up that high, the means by which to move the ramps from one spot to another once a stone was in place. Not to mention the means to ‘drag’ them over the terrain to the site, or to the boat that was supposed to carry them across a river; and if it was to a boat, let’s see the ramps they had to get them loaded on to the boat. And let’s not forget they had to quarry them out of the bedrock first – with such clean-cut edges that we would have trouble trying to do the same today. We can’t marvel at the mystery on one hand, and yet come up with the most mundane of answers on the other. Either they are marvels because they surpass us and our knowledge in every way, or there’s nothing to marvel over.

    There is also the question of their purpose in building these places. To simply say it’s for storing and distributing energy (Great Pyramid), to worship the gods associated with Jupiter, landing strips (nasca), and ‘it’s an observatory, or a marker of equinoxes and moon/sunrises, etc., belittles the mystery of these places to a great degree. Why bother building a pyramid in the centre of the earth’s landmass, with the mathematics of the solar system built throughout its being, if all it’s going to be used for is storing and distributing power/energy? What did the ‘gods’ of Jupiter ever offer them that they went to the humongous effort of putting Baal-bek together? What’s so wonderful about the equinoxes and where and when the moon rises that people felt they wanted to build such an elaborate ‘marker’ for them? Since these people knew far more working science than we do, I don’t think they all rallied around the idea of building marker for moonrises. We know less than they did and we don’t get so excited about when and where the moon rises that we want to commemorate it. And please, landing strips?! How many space travellers do we see landing in the Peruvian desert? It’s not like they need 25 landing strips, and certainly not criss-crossing each other. That’s asking for an accident! And what landing strip carves out various animals and weird objects all around it? It’s just so obvious there is much, much more to these wonders than people – especially science, is giving them credit for. A very interesting topic to be sure, but one which you could write several articles on.

    • Brenda Brown says

      Hi StarHeater. Yes, I am aware of Isaiah 19: 19-20, and I totally agree that it’s speaking of the pyramid. In fact I agree with all your comments. I think there is a great deal of meaning and purpose built into these structures, some of which science can identify with, but much that is spiritual as well. Leaving this aspect out may serve people’s own personal beliefs, but cuts off the depths of spiritual knowledge the ancients had. For them, science and spirituality were hand-in-hand, as well they should be since they knew God made science and operates on its principles all the time. But their science included a much broader spectrum than mere technology, the kind that fills the gap between technology and spirituality – much along the lines associated with Tesla and the Coral Castle. Too bad somebody wasn’t open to putting God into the picture and adding up the figures and facts as they present themselves.

      • Starheater says

        Hello Brenda

        I am glad to know that you have the same view on those subjects, I hope you will have the same opinion on the shroud of Turin. The shroud itself is a “fake”, undoubtedly a mistake of the “third kind”. And this as always, I have the proof:

        1 Corinthians 11:14 Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him?

        Whoever has created this fake, those person wasn’t really inform what Paul have said on this topic. I don’t know the author of this fake, the Church or a secret society, it doesn’t matter, the truth will prevail over this hoax.

        Bye Brenda

        • Brenda Brown says

          Hi StarHeater. I have never settled on whether or not the Shroud of Turin was genuine or not, and quite honestly, I’m not worried about it in the least. Christ rose from the grave – that’s all anyone really needs to know, as far as His death and resurrection goes. What does it matter if we have the actual shroud He was wrapped in – it won’t change anything or deal with the problems of man’s soul. And yes, I’m well aware of the scripture on men having long hair, though I must say I haven’t heard anyone use it with regards to the Shroud. Interesting point.

        • Starheater says

          Hello Brenda

          My comment is for your reply of the November 5, 2014 at 9:58 am. I know that it’s more important to know that Jesus rise rom the dead.
          But the Shroud is important too as well, why? Because it is a false representation. It’s important for certain Church, because there is a good market for those “idols” objects, even if images were free, it stay’s a “false representation” at the same tittle that the one done by Billy Meier. Here are some verses of the Bible that will change your optic on this matter, well, I hope:

          2 Corinthians 6:16 And what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God. As God has said: “I will dwell in them And walk among them. I will be their God, And they shall be My people.”
          Isaiah 2:8 Their land is also full of idols; They worship the work of their own hands, That which their own fingers have made.
          Psalms 115:4 Their idols are silver and gold, The work of men’s hands.
          Psalms 135:15 The idols of the nations are silver and gold, The work of men’s hands.
          Isaiah 2:8 Their land is also full of idols; They worship the work of their own hands, That which their own fingers have made.

          Those verses teach us one thing in particular, idols are not accept by God the Almighty, and that whatever is the idol, and whatever it show.
          Now, I have prove to you (like always), that the Shroud have a wrong view of the Face of the Christ, Jesus had short hair because it a shame to have long hair.

          Your beliefs are founded on the Bible, or they are not founded on the Bible, there is no in between. Your answer was not precise on this subject, and I want your honest opinion on this subject, and this is not a question of been a Catholic or not, it’s only a question of personnel belief, don’t worry, I will not bite you :) ok?

          Bye Brenda

    • Padraigin Eagle says

      Too true and well done, Brenda Brown; the so-called scientists, a majority PhDs so stupid by degrees, willfully ignorant of any but their master’s voices, ignoring empiricism that fit not their scepticism with monkey-mind trained lap-dog intensity, “traditional science” a thoroughly discredited malignant entity. As you indicate, Brenda, “humans, think for thyself, intuit beyond this limiting shelf, the answers be found beyond traditional ground.”

      Now, the real mystery worth exposing, lame stream media never posing, is “Why do multi-millions of so-called sentient beings, decade upon decade, stand in line to vote in the cabalian creatures, the likes of Blair, Bush, Clinton, Cameron, Obama, Zuma (down Africa way), Netanyahu, et al – nary a glimmer of soul within their Zombie facades, ancient mysteries indeed”.

      • Brenda Brown says

        Hi Padraigin Eagle. I had to read your post a couple of times to really get it, but I got there. Thanks for the thumbs up – not much of that flying around these days. As for the mystery of man’s choices, for that I think you’d have to look into their souls. Whatever darkness broods therein, that’s the kind of darkness they vote for.

  9. cyp says

    every one of the mysteries has been already explained very well . I found it offensive to believe the ancient humans were not as smart as us. Except of electronics and various machines that are only around 150 years most things could be done by them. It was much hearder and probably took a bit longer, but when there is a will there is a way. also most of the info is false and copied from the book “Chariots of the Gods”

    • Jon says

      Please explain how they were made then, since you are the only one who knows. I think you are offended by the fact of not knowing something, which means you are highly religious, superstitious, and have a low IQ.

  10. pov says

    Science doesn’t explain anything. It is a method for investigating and gaining knowledge. People explain or rather – people create explanations that they think fit things.

    • Jon says

      Really? Science doesn’t explain why it rains? Why the lunar cycles occur? Why you get sick through germ theory? Perhaps you should read a dictionary and look at “explain.”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *